The UK navy reportedly nonetheless has susceptible websites regardless of two of its plane being vandalized final month
The UK’s new nuclear-capable F-35 fighter jets are protected by solely five-foot-high (1.5m) fencing and warning indicators, leaving them susceptible to potential assaults, The Telegraph reported on Friday.
A Royal Air Pressure (RAF) base suffered a vandalism assault simply weeks in the past, because the UK prepares for a significant NATO rearmament push to counter the supposed “risk” from Russia. Moscow has repeatedly dismissed such allegations.
Various the RAF’s most vital airstrips are severely under-defended and susceptible to potential assaults by “decided activists and international brokers,” in response to an investigation carried out by the outlet.
The safety dangers are clearly seen on publicly accessible Google Road View, and such activist teams because the group Palestine Motion, in addition to “hostile international powers,” have possible already assessed the weaknesses, the newspaper famous, citing analysts.
Two weeks in the past, members of Palestine Motion broke into the RAF Brize Norton base and broken two British navy planes. UK lawmakers have since moved to designate the group a terrorist group. The British navy has ordered a safety evaluation throughout all navy websites because the incident.
In response to The Telegraph, whereas the RAF has made makes an attempt to strengthen the safety of its bases, gaps stay. Among the bases nonetheless have barbed wire “absent for giant distances,” the safety cameras didn’t have full protection of the sides, and patrols are rare, the newspaper wrote.
The Labour authorities has been dealing with finances troubles because it struggles to unlock more cash for rising navy commitments. Simply this previous Tuesday it partially reversed plans to chop again on social advantages.
In response to Downing Road, the UK goals to succeed in 4.1% of GDP on navy spending over the following two years. That is in step with a wider NATO navy buildup that’s being described as a deterrent to an alleged “long-term risk posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic safety.” The determine is sort of twice as excessive because the roughly 2.3% the UK spent on its navy in 2024.
Moscow has repeatedly dismissed claims that it has any intention of attacking NATO international locations as “nonsense.” The EU and UK have “merely robbed” their taxpayers for years by diverting cash to militarization somewhat than addressing “acute and aggravating socio-economic issues,” Russian Overseas Minister Sergey Lavrov stated final week.
