The excessive stakes, excessive profile Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ sex-trafficking trial is in its last part because the jury panel has gone into deliberations after seven weeks of testimony and last arguments.
And nearly instantly their work hit a complication yesterday (June 30), with the foreperson sending a observe saying one juror ‘apparently couldn’t observe the decide’s directions’.
New York Put up reported:
“The panelists, eight males and 4 ladies, despatched a observe to Manhattan federal courtroom Decide Arun Subramanian at round 12:40 p.m. expressing issues about one among their very own. ‘We have now a juror, ‘Juror 25,’ who we consider can not observe your directions’, the observe mentioned.”
“The juror in query is a 51-year-old man with a thick European accent. Throughout jury choice, he revealed he lives in Manhattan along with his associate and works as a scientist. He earned a PhD in molecular biology and neuroscience.”
What the observe from the jury means shouldn’t be clear, to date.
The jury panel is deliberating if Diddy’s responsible in a single rely of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex-trafficking and two counts of transportation to have interaction in prostitution.
Watch: lodge CCTV footage displaying Diddy brutally beating Cassie Ventura as she tried to flee a ‘freak-off’ intercourse marathon.
Feds launch full unedited video of Diddy and Cassie lodge combat in Los Angeles https://t.co/1i8WvoPnco
— Every day Loud (@DailyLoud) Could 15, 2025
A minimum of 34 witnesses from the prosecution have been heard in 7 weeks, whereas the protection didn’t name any, and actually solely took round 20 minutes to aim to refute the federal government’s case.
“Combs, 55, is accused of forcing his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and a former gal pal ‘Jane’ — who testified anonymously beneath the pseudonym — to have intercourse with male escorts whereas they have been on medication throughout hours-long ‘freak-offs’.”
Late within the afternoon on Monday (30), the jury despatched a second observe to the decide requesting clarification on the racketeering cost.
Forbes reported:
“The jury requested Decide Arun Subramanian late Monday afternoon, the primary day of deliberations, for readability on whether or not it’s thought-about drug distribution if an individual who’s requested for managed substances offers them to that particular person.
Drug distribution is likely one of the alleged acts jurors are being requested to think about when deciding whether or not Combs is responsible of the racketeering cost, alongside bribery, pressured labor, kidnapping, arson and intercourse trafficking, in line with the jury’s verdict sheet.
Learn extra:
