Advertisement

Starbucks avoids brewing controversy by banning presidential candidates’ names


Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
Yuna Ku

BBC Korean Service

Getty Images Hand holding a coffee cup in a Starbucks coffee shopGetty Photos

Starbucks has briefly disabled using seven explicit names on its app

Stroll into any Starbucks in South Korea proper now, and there are some names you undoubtedly will not be listening to.

Six to be precise – they usually occur to be the names of the candidates operating within the upcoming presidential race.

That is as a result of Starbucks has briefly blocked clients who’re ordering drinks from utilizing these names, which might be known as out by baristas.

The corporate stated it wanted to “keep political neutrality throughout election season”, including that this could be lifted after the election on 3 June.

South Korean companies and celebrities normally try to be seen as impartial. But it surely has turn into extra essential in current months, as political turmoil triggered by former president Yoon Suk Yeol left the nation extra divided than ever.

Now, as South Korea gears as much as decide its new president following Yoon’s impeachment, even essentially the most mundane issues can turn into politicised – a lesson Starbucks has learnt the onerous approach.

In current months, it has seen an rising variety of clients ordering drinks by way of their app and keying in phrases equivalent to “arrest Yoon Suk Yeol” or “[opposition leader] Lee Jae-myung is a spy” as their nicknames.

Starbucks baristas had little alternative however to yell out these names as soon as the drinks have been prepared for assortment.

“Our aim is to verify each buyer has a terrific expertise in our coffeehouses,” Starbucks stated in a press release about its new transfer to ban the six presidential candidates’ names.

“To assist with that, we generally block sure phrases that could possibly be misunderstood by our workers or clients — like names of political candidates with messages of help or opposition throughout election season to take care of neutrality.”

However this marks the primary time it has banned the names of all of the candidates operating in an election. Moreover Lee, the opposite names are Kim Moon-soo, Lee Jun-seok, Kwon Younger-kook, Hwang Kyo-ahn and Music Jin-ho.

Some assume the espresso big is taking issues a bit too far.

“I believe individuals are being too delicate. What in case your actual title is identical as a candidate’s?” stated 33-year-old Jang Hye-mi.

Ji Seok-bin, a 27-year-old who’s a daily at Starbucks, stated he thought the rule was “too trivial”, although he stated he understood the logic behind it given the nation’s heightened political tensions.

“After [Yoon’s impeachment] I do not actually discuss politics anymore. It feels just like the ideological divide has grown a lot that conversations usually flip into arguments.”

Ji Seok-bin

Ji Seok-bin says Starbucks’ new rule is a bit too ‘trivial’

Selfies and searches

Starbucks isn’t alone. The nation’s greatest search engine, Naver, has disabled autocomplete and associated search ideas for candidates, because it normally does throughout election season.

A search on Google for Lee, who’s extensively tipped to win the election, yields phrases like “Lee Jae-myung trial” – a reference to the truth that he’s at the moment embroiled in a number of prison trials.

A seek for the nation’s conservative presidential candidate Kim Moon-soo brings up a associated suggestion for “conversion”, as he’s extensively seen to have “transformed” from being a fervent labour activist to a conservative politician.

Naver stated it determined to do that to “present extra correct and truthful data through the election marketing campaign”.

Celebrities and public figures are additionally being additional cautious, as they’re held to excessive requirements of political impartiality. Even the garments they put on throughout election time can be extremely scrutinised.

Carrying colors like blue and purple – which signify the nation’s liberal Democratic Celebration (DP) and conservative Individuals’s Energy Celebration (PPP) respectively – has prior to now been sufficient to set off on-line backlash.

Generally, even a baseball cap or necktie alone is sufficient to spark accusations of partisan help.

Over the last presidential election in 2022, Kim Hee-chul of Ok-pop group Tremendous Junior was accused of being a PPP supporter when he was noticed sporting purple slippers and a pink masks.

Final 12 months, Shinji, lead vocalist of the favored trio Koyote, posted a black and white exercise picture on Instagram a day earlier than the final election, with the caption that she “made the picture black and white… [after] seeing the color of my sweatpants.”

“Humorous and unhappy on the identical time,” she added.

Some celebrities go even additional, intentionally sporting a mixture of purple and blue.

Defconn/Shinji/Instagram Instagram photos posted by Shinji and Defconn Defconn/Shinji/Instagram

Some celebrities intentionally put on a mixture of purple and blue – whereas others keep away from color completely

One make-up artist with over a decade of expertise working with Ok-pop stars and actors instructed the BBC that in elections, styling groups avoid politically symbolic colors.

“We normally keep on with impartial tones like black, white, or gray,” stated the make-up artist, who declined to be named.

Celebrities even must watch out when putting a pose, she added.

Flashing the peace signal for a photograph? That could possibly be learn because the quantity two – and thus an endorsement of a politician. In South Korea, election candidates are every assigned a quantity.

Dr Cho Jin-man, of Duksung Ladies’s College, says it’s “necessary to have the ability to discuss various things with out crossing the road, and to have the ability to recognise and perceive variations”.

However with a lot division within the nation, he provides that many are selecting to “stay silent to stay politically impartial”.