This text was produced for ProPublica’s Native Reporting Community in partnership with Capital & Predominant, a 2022-2023 LRN companion. Join Dispatches to get our tales in your inbox each week.
In January, Katie Clark’s one-bedroom rental of greater than 15 years, and almost all the things inside, was incinerated by Los Angeles County’s Eaton fireplace, one of the harmful wildfires in California historical past. For her troubles, she acquired a one-time fee of $770 from the Federal Emergency Administration Company, which she used to exchange garments, meals and a crate for her canine. Whereas it was solely a fraction of what she wanted, the cash was not less than accessible whereas she waited for different funding.
As an organizer with the Altadena Tenants Union who has been serving to renters with their FEMA functions, Clark is aware of simply how widespread her expertise has been for fireplace survivors. She believes federal and native businesses severely underestimated the necessity and value of housing for the 150,000 individuals displaced by the fires, leaving many nonetheless struggling to get better. A FEMA spokesperson denied the accusation, saying the company’s “ongoing assessments point out that the present Rental Help program is successfully assembly the housing wants of survivors eligible for FEMA help.”
The catastrophe response “has been so shockingly unhealthy,” Clark mentioned, however she acknowledges that with out FEMA’s assist in responding to fires that killed not less than 30 individuals and destroyed greater than 16,000 buildings, “it might have been so, so, a lot worse.”
“We’d have seen an entire lot extra individuals left to their very own gadgets. And what that may imply is homelessness. It could imply individuals simply deserted,” Clark mentioned.
Even earlier than President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom squared off over Trump’s resolution to ship Nationwide Guard troops to quell immigration protests, earlier than Newsom likened Trump to a dictator and Trump endorsed the concept of arresting the governor, the query of how a lot California might proceed to depend on FEMA was entrance and middle.
It’s a essential query in a state — with its earthquakes, wildfires, floods, drought and excessive warmth — that often suffers a few of the costliest disasters within the nation.
Since Trump’s inauguration, his administration has floated sweeping proposals that may slash FEMA {dollars} and make disasters tougher to declare. This has left each blue and crimson states wrestling with situations through which they need to pay for what FEMA is not going to. States have lengthy counted on FEMA to cowl not less than 75% of declared main catastrophe response and restoration prices.
In simply the previous few months, FEMA has denied federal help for devastating floods in West Virginia and a harmful windstorm in Washington. The company authorized such funding for lethal tornadoes in Arkansas after Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders appealed an preliminary denial and personally begged the president for assist.
Final month, ProPublica reported that FEMA missed a Could deadline to open the applying course of for a lot of grants, together with funding that states depend on to pay for primary emergency administration operations. The delay, which the company has not defined, seems to have little precedent.
In California, Trump has forged doubt on whether or not he’ll approve the $40 billion Newsom has requested to assist pay for restoration prices related to the fires, together with $16.8 billion from FEMA to rebuild property, infrastructure and take away particles. That’s on prime of the just about $140 million the company has already offered to particular person survivors.
The president informed reporters final month that states should be weaned off FEMA and that the federal authorities will begin distributing much less federal help after hurricane season ends in November.
The questions now are: How a lot will probably be authorized? Will it’s sufficient? And, if not, what then?
A FEMA spokesperson didn’t instantly reply to questions from Capital & Predominant about anticipated funding cuts and potential impacts on state and native communities, however mentioned the company “asserts that disasters are finest managed once they’re federally supported, state managed and domestically executed.”
The uncertainty makes it “very onerous” to plan, mentioned Heather Gonzalez, principal fiscal and coverage analyst for emergency companies at California’s Legislative Analyst’s Workplace. “The little bean-counters within the again are stressing out proper now attempting to determine ‘what are we going to must work with?’”
The current “dust-ups” between Newsom and Trump, she mentioned, have solely underscored the unpredictability. For his half, Newsom mentioned he prefers the “open hand” of cooperation over the “closed fist” of combating relating to catastrophe response.
“Emergency preparedness and emergency planning, restoration and renewal — interval, full cease — that must be nonpolitical,” he mentioned on Monday, which marked six months for the reason that fires.
Credit score:
Jeremy Lindenfeld/Capital & Predominant
The Rising Price of Disasters
Since not less than the Eighties, California has endured a quickly rising variety of billion-dollar disasters, with 18 occurring between 2015 and 2024 alone.
Because the frequency and severity of California’s disasters improve, so too does its reliance on federal help to reply. Within the aftermath of January’s Eaton and Palisades fires — the second and third most harmful wildfires in California historical past, respectively — FEMA has already offered $139 million for all the things from dwelling restore prices to medical bills, and the company “has allotted billions of {dollars} for particles removing,” based on a FEMA spokesperson. Over 5,000 properties have already been cleared of ash and fireplace particles.
Credit score:
Sarahbeth Maney/ProPublica
Los Angeles County Workplace of Emergency Administration Communications Director Emily Montanez mentioned restoration efforts for the fires doubtless gained’t be full for a few years and are closely depending on FEMA.
“After the Northridge earthquake in 1994, FEMA had discipline workplaces right here for 28 years,” Montanez mentioned. “We see this as being no totally different. This was far more devastation, far more impression. So this could possibly be years, positively many years.”
Whereas Montanez acknowledged that potential “gaps” in catastrophe response efforts go away some survivors with out adequate sources, she mentioned that the current operations coordinated between FEMA and native businesses in Los Angeles have largely been environment friendly and profitable.
FEMA’s federal help dietary supplements California’s personal catastrophe response and mitigation sources like these allotted to the Governor’s Workplace of Emergency Providers, which was allotted $4.4 billion within the Could revision of the state’s 2025-26 price range. When the workplace’s funding doesn’t cowl all catastrophe prices, California also can pull from quite a lot of its reserves, together with the Price range Stabilization Account and Particular Fund for Financial Uncertainties.
Newsom informed Capital & Predominant on Monday that the state has elevated its discretionary reserves as a direct consequence of Trump’s ongoing threats to FEMA, although he admitted that even that elevated funding wouldn’t make up for the potential loss in federal funding.
California “can’t backfill the elimination of FEMA,” Newsom mentioned. “There’s no state in America [that can], even essentially the most endowed state — $4.1 trillion a 12 months economic system — largest within the nation, fourth largest on the earth.”
And California’s $12 billion price range deficit will make backfilling the workplace’s shortfall particularly troublesome the following time a serious catastrophe strikes, based on Laurie Schoeman, senior adviser on local weather resilience to former President Joe Biden.
That will probably be made even tougher if the still-unfinalized proposals outlined in an inside FEMA memo are carried out, based on Schoeman. One of many reforms floated within the memo caps the proportion of restoration prices lined by the federal authorities on the present baseline of 75%. Underneath present guidelines, the president can improve FEMA’s price share as much as 100%, as Biden did for the Los Angeles fires lower than two weeks earlier than he left workplace.
One other proposal quadruples the quantity of injury that must be suffered in a catastrophe earlier than FEMA awards any public help grants for infrastructure restore and particles removing. That may hike California’s harm threshold from roughly $75 million to almost $300 million per catastrophe.
Had simply that second reform been in place between 2008 and 2024, California would have acquired 26% much less in public help funding from FEMA, a lack of almost $2 billion, based on a Could evaluation by the City Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based suppose tank.
Such diminished funding throughout future occasions would trigger an “apocalyptic state of affairs” the place California communities would battle to afford the price of working shelters and paying for emergency responders to rescue catastrophe victims, based on Sarah Labowitz, a senior fellow within the Sustainability, Local weather, and Geopolitics Program on the Carnegie Endowment for Worldwide Peace.
But already, important harm has been accomplished, Schoeman mentioned.
In April, the Trump administration canceled the Constructing Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, a FEMA initiative devoted to funding disaster-preparedness initiatives. Over $880 million in federal funding was rescinded, together with a $35 million grant in California’s Napa County largely devoted to wildfire prevention work. The administration declined to reply to Capital & Predominant’s request for remark, referring inquiries to FEMA. An company spokesperson mentioned that its strategy to catastrophe preparedness mirrors that of catastrophe response: FEMA will play a supporting position.
“All kinds of preparedness begin with households, people and native and state officers forward of any emergency and catastrophe,” an announcement from the company mentioned.
The rescinded federal funding dangers undermining communities’ skills to guard in opposition to future disasters, Schoeman mentioned, and undoes work completed below Trump’s first time period.
“They’re simply slicing these initiatives though they’ve confirmed profit price analyses in place,” Schoeman mentioned. “The BRIC program was began below the Trump administration … so it feels just like the administration goes to chop their very own leg off.”
Credit score:
Jeremy Lindenfeld/Capital & Predominant
Clark mentioned she is already struggling to get assist. She mentioned her insurance coverage supplier has thus far withheld over $25,000 resulting from disagreements over whether or not her transitional housing qualifies as momentary, and her functions for extra FEMA help have been denied resulting from her technically being insured. Some wealthier survivors had “the insulation and resiliency that financial sources provide you with,” whereas others needed to depend upon nonprofits or the sort of authorities help that’s now in danger to afford transitional housing.
“When you don’t have these financial sources, your solely choice is to show to both philanthropy or the state,” Clark mentioned. “If neither of these can be found, then powerful luck.”
