In a sharply-worded opinion piece revealed within the Monetary Specific, Shah drew a stark distinction between Indian and Chinese language markets, highlighting three structural deterrents that he believes make such manipulative conduct practically unimaginable in China.
“First, Chinese language markets are largely closed to international speculators for such actions, limiting entry,” Shah wrote. “Second, Chinese language regulators wield formidable energy, using ways akin to sam, dam, dand, bhed (persuasion, fines, punishment, or division) to implement deterrence and compliance. Third, the reminiscence of a well known hedge fund being squeezed by the China Funding Company in a brief renminbi commerce serves as a robust deterrent.”
Regulatory muscle should match market complexity
Shah argued that whereas the Securities and Change Board of India’s (Sebi) latest motion in opposition to Jane Avenue showcases its surveillance and forensic capabilities, extra must be completed to make India’s market enforcement really efficient.
He pointed to the persistence of unresolved instances from the 1992 securities rip-off and drew comparisons with the U.S. authorized system, the place mechanisms exist to recuperate investor losses, citing the Bernie Madoff case.
Shah likened the Indian F&O markets to a village derivatives bazaar the place a robust dealer repeatedly exploits a rigged cycle, drawing a parallel to Jane Avenue’s alleged behaviour. He cautioned that India’s institutional buyers, constrained by regulation and buying and selling methods corresponding to volume-weighted common value (VWAP), lack the aggression and agility to behave as a counterforce to such entities.“A brand new institutional mechanism outfitted with superior information analytics, high-speed connectivity, and entry to leverage is required,” Shah mentioned, “as is the flexibility to behave decisively to neutralise HFT dominance.”Sebi on July 3 barred U.S.-based Jane Avenue and 4 affiliated entities from accessing Indian markets, accusing them of manipulating index ranges on 18 expiry days over a two-year interval and profiting disproportionately from index choices trades. The regulator has ordered the impounding of Rs 4,840 crore in alleged unlawful good points.
Additionally learn | Rs 735 crore in 1 day! Jane Avenue’s most worthwhile day on Dalal Avenue was constructed on Nifty Financial institution’s fall
5 reforms to forestall one other Jane Avenue:
Shah proposed 5 systemic reforms that he believes are important to revive integrity, defend retail buyers, and guarantee India doesn’t turn out to be “a playground for manipulative retailers.”
1. Strengthen regulatory powers
Shah referred to as for fortifying Sebi’s enforcement capability with a sharper authorized toolkit. Whereas praising the regulator’s data-driven motion in opposition to Jane Avenue, he identified that India’s justice system lacks the velocity and energy required to deal with fashionable monetary frauds.
“Industrial crimes, like market manipulation, typically trigger higher societal hurt however face lenient therapy as a result of absence of a ‘lifeless physique’,” Shah mentioned. “Empowering Sebi with strong authorized instruments and fostering a concern of swift punishment are important to deterring future violations.”
2. Create counterbalancing mechanisms
Shah warned that India’s institutional buyers, constrained by guidelines and low-risk methods like volume-weighted common value (VWAP), can’t counterbalance aggressive HFTs like Jane Avenue.
“A brand new institutional mechanism outfitted with superior information analytics, high-speed connectivity, and entry to leverage is required,” he mentioned, “as is the flexibility to behave decisively to neutralise HFT dominance.”
3. Deal with industrial crime critically
Drawing parallels with previous regulatory failures, Shah mentioned Sebi should transcend financial restoration and impose deterrent penalties. He cited the Bhopal fuel tragedy as a cautionary story of restricted penalties for catastrophic wrongdoing.
“Sebi’s order in opposition to Jane Avenue… should transcend recovering manipulated income,” Shah wrote. “An exemplary penalty is required to discourage future manipulations.”
4. Curb speculative mania
Addressing the surge in retail F&O buying and selling, Shah likened the speculative frenzy to dependancy fuelled by greed and social media hype.
“In our F&O markets, a bloodbath happens each week, the place thousands and thousands of Indians get killed economically, not by bullets however by their greed,” he mentioned. He in contrast quick-profit seekers to drug addicts and the mythological demon Raktabij: “Slay one, and 100 extra emerge.”
Shah advocated statutory warnings on derivatives buying and selling, tighter restrictions on promotion, and probably a levy on F&O trades to fund investor schooling and safety.
5. Prioritise monetary schooling
Calling schooling the final word antidote to retail vulnerability, Shah urged regulators to scale up literacy efforts and implement more durable gatekeeping for dangerous merchandise.
“The anti-dote to greed is monetary schooling,” he mentioned, recommending that merchants be required to cross qualifying exams earlier than being allowed to interact in leveraged trades.
Past detection: a warning for the longer term
Whereas Sebi’s motion has stirred much-needed dialog, Shah’s central message is that enforcement alone isn’t sufficient.
“Unchecked monetary muscle and speculative frenzy can destabilise markets leaving retail buyers weak,” Shah mentioned. “Solely by addressing these points head-on can India forestall its markets from changing into playgrounds for manipulative retailers.”
Additionally learn | Jane Avenue clampdown raises large questions for Sebi: Can the regulator cease one other derivatives fraud?
(Disclaimer: Suggestions, recommendations, views and opinions given by the specialists are their very own. These don’t characterize the views of the Financial Instances)
