Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
On account of main shifts within the international vitality and geopolitical panorama, grids right this moment face an ideal storm of surging energy demand, ageing infrastructure and rising bodily and digital threats, strengthening the case to future-proof the vitality system by way of grid digitalisation.
Shubbhronil Roy, VP of technique and transformation at Schneider Electrical, speaks to Energy Expertise about filling the gaps within the digital transformation for higher grid resilience. From stronger data know-how (IT) and operational know-how (OT) alignment to incremental implementation methods, Roy outlines a practical but hopeful imaginative and prescient for a extra resilient, digital future.
Shubbhronil Roy is the Vice President of digital grids technique, advertising and marketing and transformation at Schneider Electrical. Credit score: Schneider Electrical.
Shubbhronil Roy (SR): The primary is the vitality transition and push for decarbonisation. There may be vital acceleration in renewable vitality adoption the world over. In Europe, as an illustration, over 40% of electrical energy era is anticipated to be renewable by 2030.
Nevertheless, present grids can not deal with this new renewable load. Round 1,700GW of renewables in Europe and three,000GW globally are prepared however can’t be linked to the grid as a result of the infrastructure isn’t prepared, resulting in congestion and potential blackouts. So, whereas renewables enhance, the grid have to be upgraded accordingly.
The second is ageing – each infrastructure and workforce. Most grids within the US and Europe have been constructed within the mid-1900s. Over 50% of transformers and substations will attain end-of-life by 2030. Equally, greater than 50% of the present workforce is anticipated to retire by then.
The third is cybersecurity. Cyber threats have greater than doubled within the final two years, particularly with escalating geopolitical conflicts just like the state of affairs in Ukraine, and grids are being focused. Disrupting the grid can plunge complete cities into darkness, making this a vital subject.
The fourth entails main climate occasions – tornadoes, wildfires, storms and so forth – which are turning into extra frequent because the local weather disaster progresses. Notably, as much as 83% of latest blackouts have been attributed to such occasions, inflicting not solely human loss however vital monetary harm.
Lastly, we see huge future energy demand, pushed by AI and information centres, inhabitants progress, industrialisation and electrification. General, we anticipate 30% extra demand within the subsequent 20 years than what we have skilled over the previous 50.
These outlined challenges outline the grid’s present and future panorama.
SR: I don’t consider there shall be one clear winner among the many “three Ds.” It’s about discovering the correct formulation for the correct area and folks.
Globally, we observe variations in renewable adoption, cybersecurity, regulation and utility buildings. As an illustration, the US has vertically built-in utilities – one entity handles era, transmission and distribution (T&D) and retail. In Europe, it’s unbundled – completely different entities handle every half. Power is a localized enterprise on this sense. So, decentralisation and decarbonisation imply various things in several contexts.
Since grids are regulated, not purely profit-driven, politics and public service are additionally central [to what is prioritised] within the area. Within the US, for instance, decarbonisation is a politically delicate time period, however resiliency and affordability are common priorities, therefore turning into the drivers behind the three Ds.
SR: If I needed to identify one main blind spot in digitalising the grid, it might be information integration. Knowledge is commonly referred to as the brand new vitality forex. However inside utilities, we see huge silos – between departments, and even inside IT and OT groups. Every system makes use of completely different information fashions, so there isn’t a single supply of reality.
Throughout proof-of-concepts, we’ve discovered that operators usually query the information itself as a substitute of discussing what actions to take. There’s frequent disagreement: “this information isn’t right” or “that wasn’t logged correctly”. This undermines the power to prescribe options based mostly on information.
Even mature utilities battle to construct community fashions. It might take months as a result of the silo drawback runs deep. Utilities are beginning to realise the significance of a unified information mannequin, however the highway forward entails connecting techniques, breaking down silos and guaranteeing constant information throughout the enterprise.
SR: Traditionally, IT and OT have operated in silos. For instance, IT may handle the client division and billing, whereas the GIS (geographic data techniques) mapping substations and family connectivity might sit in OT or one other IT group. These are completely different techniques, constructed at completely different occasions, they usually not often communicate the identical language.
Regardless of billions spent on integration over the past decade, it’s nonetheless usually a patchwork. Integration isn’t holistic – it connects system A to system B however doesn’t obtain full alignment. As a substitute, we get duplication, mismatched information and typically poor outcomes.
As new techniques are added – like demand response (DR) techniques – questions come up once more: ought to we construct a brand new database or combine with current ones?
Utilities are huge, with sprawling infrastructure – era, transmission, medium and low voltage distribution, industrial and customer support. Inside every alone, there are a number of layers. Aligning all the things is a monumental activity.
Additionally, laws differ throughout departments. OT inside a utility might function underneath totally completely different guidelines to IT. It’s a legacy of how the business advanced – regulated, conservative and fragmented.
SR: For the vitality transition and grid digitalisation to progress, IT and OT should converge. We’re already seeing this shift, some by OT and others by IT, however these strains are blurring. Collaboration is essential.
Now, OT advantages immensely from AI, enabled by IT capabilities. For AI to work successfully, IT and OT want a shared basis. Utilities should set up frameworks the place these departments collaborate absolutely. Once more, it’s not about one aspect successful – it’s about joint effort, tailored to every utility’s maturity.
The cloud additionally helps. Given the vital nature of the grid and cybersecurity dangers, a hybrid cloud mannequin makes essentially the most sense. Much less vital functions can run within the cloud; mission-critical ones can keep on-premises. This combines agility and safety. Our “One Digital Grid” platform embodies this precept – open, modular, safe and incremental.
SR: Substations are essential. They transfer electrical energy by way of T&D networks into our properties. Excessive voltage is diminished by way of substations to decrease voltage appropriate for residential use.
Digitisation of substations is growing quickly. We’re now pushing intelligence to the sting, the place the information originates. Beforehand, selections have been centralised, however now, with localised intelligence, actions might be taken extra rapidly, proper on the substation, with out counting on the management centre.
Consider it just like the human physique: in case your limbs may react independently with out ready for alerts from the mind, response occasions can be sooner. Substation response delays can vary from milliseconds to minutes when not all the things is digitised and a few information continues to be collected manually. Edge intelligence reduces that lag.
One other rising idea is the digital substation, the place {hardware} features are more and more changed by software program. With AI and fashionable know-how, intelligence itself will change into a commodity.
SR: Positively. One main lesson got here from COVID, throughout which firms with sturdy digital infrastructure and powerful enterprise continuity plans thrived, whereas others struggled. That interval highlighted how important digitalisation is for resilience.
Submit-COVID, we noticed a big uptick in digital transformation, not simply in vitality however throughout industries. Corporations throughout all sectors realised they wanted to be ready for disruptions.
One other lesson from sectors reminiscent of meals and beverage, FMCG and prescription drugs is the shift away from massive “Massive Bang” digitalisation tasks. As a substitute, it must be about stepwise implementation and use case-driven growth.
Our firm has even banned the phrase “pilot” internally. It’s now about actual testing, with actual buyer information, for actual outcomes. This strategy has allowed us to assist our companions; for instance, we helped Nestlé digitise a whole bunch of crops with spectacular effectivity and continuity features.
SR: Resilience is now not optionally available. Take the Iberian Peninsula incident, for instance: it took 13 hours to revive the system, regardless of good infrastructure and protocols. This confirmed present techniques aren’t ample for future calls for. Grids have been initially constructed for one-way vitality stream. Now, with EVs, distributed renewables and bi-directional stream, the strain is way better.
Digitalisation can enhance resiliency by permitting us to anticipate and act earlier than points happen. The necessity for grid visibility and predictability is simply growing – with out these upgrades, the vitality transition merely cannot occur.
However know-how alone is not sufficient. Individuals, partnerships and regulation are equally vital. The way forward for grid digitalisation is dependent upon all these facets coming collectively, so this may be the subsequent frontier.
The grid is important to sustainability, electrification, industrialisation and local weather motion. We should be certain that the grid turns into an enabler, not an impediment, of the transition.
Fortunately, consciousness is rising, and I consider the subsequent 10 years shall be transformative for grid innovation. Whether or not will probably be sufficient to satisfy net-zero targets – I can’t say. However we’re shifting in the correct course.
“Q&A: Schneider Electrical on fashionable vitality threats, digitalisation and grid resilience ” was initially created and printed by Energy Expertise, a GlobalData owned model.
The knowledge on this website has been included in good religion for common informational functions solely. It isn’t supposed to quantity to recommendation on which it is best to rely, and we give no illustration, guarantee or assure, whether or not specific or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You should receive skilled or specialist recommendation earlier than taking, or refraining from, any motion on the idea of the content material on our website.
