The seventh week of the federal legal trial in opposition to Sean “Diddy” Combs wrapped on Friday, June 27. Final week, the courtroom heard closing arguments from the prosecution and the 55-year-old’s protection crew. Moreover, the prosecution doubled down on their assertion that Diddy ran a legal enterprise by way of his companies. Moreover, they reminded the jury of how Diddy allegedly used threats, coercion, and exploitation to hold out his alleged prostitution and intercourse trafficking of varied people. In flip, Diddy’s protection crew fired again on these claims. They alleged that the case in opposition to Diddy is exaggerated and fueled by witnesses’ greed for cash. Moreover, they argued that the mogul is simply responsible of being a not-so-nice one that participated in a swinger life-style.
Now that it’s all stated and finished, the jury will deliberate on the arguments from either side. Will Diddy stroll away a free man? Or is he taking a look at time behind bars?
The Shade Room’s Justin Carter is reflecting on all of it on ‘TSR Investigates.’
What Occurred Throughout Week 7 Of The Diddy Trial?
In response to Carter, the prosecution didn’t hesitate to recount the alleged occasions that occurred throughout Cassie’s romance with Diddy — from the March 2016 resort assault to the alleged $100,000 paid to cover the safety footage. Moreover, prosecutors performed audio of Diddy instructing one other former accomplice of his, a girl solely referred to as “Jane Doe,” to get on her “job” in facilitating his alleged drug-fueled freakoffs. Moreover, prosecutors argued Diddy even coerced Jane into the “wild” nights by threatening to withhold paying her $10,000 agreed-upon lease funds.
For the protection, Marc Agnifilo accused prosecutors of focusing on Diddy and even questioned the validity of the racketeering cost in opposition to him. Per Carter, he referred to as the cost a “fragment” of the “prosecution’s creativeness,” arguing that the trial in opposition to Diddy shouldn’t be about crime however cash. Moreover, they argued that the male escorts who participated within the freakoffs did so willingly, unmotivated by the reward of lush funds.
What Will The Verdict Be?
Finally, the prosecution had the final phrase with their rebuttal of the protection’s closing arguments. Per Carter, they emphasised that the protection solely strived to “distract from Combs’ inexcusable habits.” Moreover, they famous that the trial solely showcased how “‘no’ was by no means an choice” in his world. Now, a jury of 12 — eight males and 4 girls — will resolve on Diddy’s destiny. Will he stroll free or spend many years behind bars?
RELATED: Kroger And Different Firms Spark BACKLASH Over Juneteenth Flubs | TSR Investigates
What Do You Assume Roomies?
