
ADDIS ABABA / NAIROBI, Jun 25 (IPS) – Think about investing US$14 billion, and even barely much less, to realize common literacy in 17 African nations the place greater than half the grownup inhabitants nonetheless can’t learn or write. Pair that with one other US$36 billion to attach Africa’s landlocked nations by way of 12,000 kilometres of recent railway strains alongside precedence transport corridors.
These should not distant ambitions; they’re costed, achievable interventions. And even after financing each, donors would nonetheless have billions left — if that they had honoured the $71.74 billion in assist they pledged to Africa however by no means delivered.
Over the past 20 years, G7 and multilateral donors dedicated $292 billion of assist to Africa. However $71.74 billion of the promised funds have been by no means disbursed. This isn’t mere bureaucratic slippage, it’s Abroad Improvement Support (ODA) debt: growth funds owed however withheld. It’s a debt that undermines the very premise of partnership.
Even when assist does arrive, it’s too short-term to help structural transformation. G7 tasks now final a median of simply 3.18 years, far beneath the usual five-year cycles of African nationwide growth plans.
In conflict-affected and fragile states, the durations are even shorter. Throughout all contexts, the issue is compounded by persistent disbursement delays: by yr 5, one-third of dedicated assist stays undelivered.
The African Union has declared 2025 the Yr of Reparations, a recognition that at present’s growth disaster can’t be understood with out contemplating centuries of slavery and colonial historical past and their continuation below the present international financial techniques. However reparations should not simply in regards to the previous.
They immediately deal with the persevering with drain on Africa’s potential whereas dressing up inequality within the language of “assist” and “growth cooperation.”
The reality is the help system isn’t “damaged.” It’s working the identical method it at all times has. As an alternative of remodeling the World South, the structure of the help system stabilizes the World North. It protects industrial and overseas pursuits, relatively than prioritizing efforts to finish abject poverty.
Support flows are sometimes tied to industrial circumstances, resembling requiring recipient governments to buy items and companies from the donor nation. These preparations increase the donor’s exports and help its home industries.
On the similar time, assist permits donor nations to take care of political affect in strategic areas, aligning growth cooperation with their overseas coverage objectives. It’s neither altruism nor an try and right historic injustice. Relatively, it’s an financial technique cloaked in ethical obligation.
Donors speak about “African capability” and “possession,” whereas retaining the facility to resolve when, how, and even when the cash will arrive. All of that is topic to the political tides and election cycles of the World North.
We’re advised to be accountable, but the help system itself stays deeply unaccountable. France has proposed slashing its growth assist funds by 40%, regardless of having handed a regulation this yr to extend its assist to fulfill the UN’s goal of no less than 0.7% of gross nationwide earnings devoted to ODA.
Belgium has introduced a 25% reduce. In the meantime, america’ sweeping assist reductions have hit Africa notably arduous, undermining packages in well being, diet, and meals safety. Extra World North nations are anticipated to comply with swimsuit together with Germany, the world’s second-largest ODA supplier.
These should not remoted coverage selections. These are signs of a worldwide structure that was by no means designed to ship justice.
For this reason the African Union’s Yr of Reparations should develop into a rallying cry. Reparations should not nearly colonial theft; they confront the continuing circumstances that perpetuate continued financial exploitation. The identical extractive patterns that fuelled slavery and colonial empires now manifest in commerce agreements, debt regimes, tax havens, and the help system.
On this system, “international partnership” typically feels extra like containment. What is obtainable as “solidarity” is underpinned by hierarchy. This type of “help” isn’t assist – it’s managed underdevelopment.
Justice might be pursued by way of current international and African-led mechanisms — from UN-led platforms such because the Financing for Improvement (FfD) course of, to rising African-led financing reforms. It is a name for significant political will to reorient the system.
Right here’s what should change:
- Reframe assist as a device of justice, not charity.
Improvement cooperation have to be grounded in historic obligation and international solidarity, not donor discretion. Africa wants long-term, predictable financing aligned with nationwide priorities, not three-year tasks designed in Brussels or Washington.
- Make assist commitments enforceable.
The 0.7% goal can’t stay symbolic. Donor pledges have to be backed by binding frameworks, common reporting, and penalties for non-compliance.
- Dismantle the colonial structure of assist.
Support supply techniques should shift management to African establishments. The present mannequin, designed round donor danger administration and political optics, should give solution to one centred on recipient sovereignty.
- Decisively cope with the dedication–disbursement hole.
Delays in disbursing dedicated assist are breaches of belief that should carry penalties. There is no such thing as a justification for donors to function with out accountability when African governments typically face penalties or curiosity for delayed funds.
The $71.74 billion that Africa was promised however by no means acquired over the previous 20 years might have completed a lot. It nonetheless can – whether it is repaid.
Africa isn’t asking for generosity. It’s asserting its proper to equity, redress, and a future formed by itself phrases. Allow us to not fake that one other accountability dashboard or assist convention will repair this. The system have to be reconstructed inclusively and grounded in justice—for Africa.
This text is co-authored by Martha Bekele (Co-founder, DevTransform), primarily based in Addis Ababa, and Vitalice Meja (Govt Director, Actuality of Support – Africa), primarily based in Nairobi.
© Inter Press Service (2025) — All Rights Reserved. Unique supply: Inter Press Service