Erin Patterson, pictured at her house in Leongatha, Victoria, Australia, in August 2023. Three individuals died of dying cap poisoning after consuming a meal she had cooked the earlier month.
Jason Edwards/Newspix through Getty Pictures
cover caption
toggle caption
Jason Edwards/Newspix through Getty Pictures
The Australian girl accused of killing her estranged husband’s aged kinfolk with poisonous mushrooms in a home-cooked meal is sharing her story — and dropping bombshells — throughout a number of days of testimony in court docket.
Erin Patterson, 50, is accused of deliberately placing dying cap mushrooms — that are among the many most toxic on the earth — in a beef Wellington dish she served at a July 2023 lunch at her house within the small city of Leongatha, some 85 miles from Melbourne.
All 4 of her visitors — her husband’s mother and father, aunt and uncle — have been hospitalized with gastrointestinal signs the next day, and three of them died the next week from altered liver perform and a number of organ failure resulting from Amanita mushroom poisoning.
Patterson was briefly hospitalized however didn’t have the identical signs as her visitors. She testified that she vomited later that day after consuming two-thirds of a cake that they had introduced.
Patterson, a mom of two, denies that the poisoning was deliberate and has pleaded not responsible to 3 counts of homicide and one depend of tried homicide. She faces life imprisonment if convicted.
As Patterson’s triple homicide trial within the Victoria state Supreme Courtroom unfolds, she has admitted to mendacity about sure particulars of her story — such because the most cancers analysis she invited her visitors over to inform them about, her beforehand undisclosed mushroom foraging passion and the truth that she had owned a meals dehydrator however shortly disposed of it in the course of the investigation.
“Even after you have been discharged from hospital you didn’t inform a single person who there could have been foraged mushroom used within the meal,” prosecutor Nanette Rogers requested her Friday. “As an alternative you bought up, you drove your youngsters to high school … and drove house. And you then removed the dehydrator.”
“Right,” Patterson replied.
The trial, which started in April, was initially anticipated to take round six weeks. Justice Christopher Beale stated Thursday there are a number of extra steps within the proceedings, probably together with listening to new proof, earlier than the jury is sequestered for deliberations.
“After which the boot is on the opposite foot, as a result of none of you possibly can inform me how lengthy you can be in deliberations,” Beale stated. “How lengthy is a chunk of string? You’ll take on a regular basis you want.”
Listed below are a number of the greatest takeaways from Patterson’s week on the stand.
1. Patterson complained about her in-laws behind their backs
Erin and Simon Patterson bought married in 2007 and, after splitting and reconciling a number of instances through the years, separated completely in 2015. They remained amicable and in shut contact, sharing custody of their two youngsters, seeing one another in church and even occurring holidays collectively.
Simon was invited to the fateful lunch however declined the invitation the night time earlier than.
Patterson was additionally on good phrases together with her in-laws, Gail and Donald Patterson, each 70, saying in court docket that “they handled me like their very own daughter.”
However prosecutors — and Patterson herself — acknowledged that her relationship with Simon began deteriorating in 2022. Patterson stated after noticing that he described himself as single on his tax return, she requested him to start out paying youngster assist, which he did. However they continued to battle over associated points, together with which college their youngsters ought to attend and who ought to pay the charges.
On Thursday, Rogers requested Patterson to learn from Sign messages she had despatched to Donald and Gail in regards to the disputed college charges. Patterson denied that she was asking her in-laws to make Simon pay for them.
“What I wished from them, whether or not I communicated it nicely or not, was I wished Don and Gail to assist Simon and I talk higher about it,” Patterson stated. “I believed that … if Simon knew that Don and Gail knew how he was behaving, he may change his behaviour.”
However Don and Gail took Simon’s facet, which prosecutors allege made Patterson indignant.
On Friday, the prosecution requested Patterson about Fb messages she despatched to associates in late 2022 complaining about Simon’s mother and father, together with: “Don messaged to say he and Gail do not need to get entangled within the monetary issues however simply hope we are going to pray for the children,” alongside what she disputes was an eye-rolling emoji. Elsewhere, she wrote, “‘This household I swear to f****** god.”
“‘I believed his mother and father would need him to do the proper factor nevertheless it appears their concern about not desirous to really feel uncomfortable and never desirous to get entangled of their sons private issues are overriding that so f*** em,” learn one other message.
Underneath questioning, Patterson denied that the messages mirrored her true emotions about Don and Gail, and stated she was merely “venting.” However Rogers accused her of getting “two faces: a public face of showing to have relationship with Don and Gail” and a personal face mirrored in her Fb messages.
“Are you asking me to agree if I had two faces?” Patterson replied, earlier than answering, “I had relationship with Don and Gail.”
Flowers relaxation on the grave website for Don and Gail Patterson on the Korumburra Normal Cemetery throughout their daughter-in-law’s trial in Might 2025.
Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Pictures
cover caption
toggle caption
Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Pictures
2. Patterson denies telling her visitors she had most cancers
Prosecutors say Patterson invited Don and Gail Patterson, in addition to Gail’s sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, and her husband Ian Wilkinson, 68, over for lunch to debate some medical points she was going through and easy methods to break the information to her youngsters (whom she dropped off for lunch and a film with a good friend earlier than her visitors arrived).
Primarily based on accounts from Ian Wilkinson, the only survivor, Patterson instructed the group at lunch that she had been identified with most cancers after noticing a bump on her elbow, and requested for recommendation on whether or not to inform her youngsters.
In court docket on Thursday, Patterson acknowledged that she had misled Gail in regards to the lump on her elbow within the weeks earlier than the lunch, and did not have medical points to speak both to her visitors or her youngsters.
“I did not have a official medical cause, no, that is true,” Patterson stated.
When requested instantly, Patterson repeatedly denied telling her lunch visitors that she had most cancers — contradicting Wilkinson’s model of occasions. However she admitted that on the finish of the lunch, “I am not happy with this, however I led them to imagine that I could be needing some therapy,” following up on a earlier ovarian most cancers scare.
“I am unable to bear in mind the exact phrases, however I do know what I used to be making an attempt to speak was that I used to be present process investigations round ovarian most cancers and may want therapy in that regard sooner or later,” she stated. “I am unable to say that that was the precise phrases I used, however that is what I bear in mind wanting to speak.”
Patterson stated she had lengthy struggled with low vanity due to her weight and had made an appointment for that September to look into gastric bypass surgical procedure.
“I used to be actually embarrassed about it, so I believed maybe letting them imagine I had some severe subject that wanted therapy may imply they’d be capable of assist me with the logistics across the youngsters and I would not have to inform them the actual cause,” she stated.
Rogers advised that Patterson by no means deliberate to account for her most cancers lie “since you thought that the lunch visitors would die,” to which Patterson replied, “That is not true.”
3. Patterson accepts there have been dying cap mushrooms within the meals
Patterson stated Tuesday that she accepts there will need to have been dying cap mushrooms within the meal she made, an admission she had lengthy withheld.
Within the quick aftermath of the incident, Patterson instructed docs and investigators that she used two sorts of mushrooms for her dish: recent from the grocery retailer and dried from a Chinese language grocer within the space, although she could not bear in mind which one. In interviews with police, she denied proudly owning a dehydrator and foraging for mushrooms.
On the opening day of the trial, nonetheless, her lawyer, Colin Mandy, confirmed these had been lies, however stated Patterson “denies that she ever intentionally sought out dying cap mushrooms.”
Patterson stated on the stand that she began foraging for mushrooms at trails and botanical gardens in her space in early 2020, and joined Fb teams to establish and be taught in regards to the completely different sorts.
The Victorian authorities issued a warning in early 2023 that dying cap mushrooms have been rising within the area. Patterson repeatedly stated she could not bear in mind utilizing the naturalist web site that marked the place the poisonous mushrooms had been discovered.
Patterson acknowledged shopping for a meals dehydrator in April 2023, however denied prosecutors’ allegation that she traveled to a close-by city to gather dying cap mushrooms that very same month. She admitted to disposing of the gadget after the lunch, however stated she did not know dying cap mushrooms had been in it.
She stated whereas she was getting ready the meat Wellington — which is usually coated in mushroom paste and wrapped in pastry — “it appeared a little bit bland to me, so I made a decision to place within the dried mushrooms that I would purchased from the grocery store that I nonetheless had within the pantry.”
“I did not intentionally put dying cap mushrooms within the meal,” Patterson stated, however acknowledged she now thinks there was an opportunity that a few of her foraged mushrooms have been additionally in that Tupperware.
She stated the chance solely occurred to her days later, as her kinfolk’ situations deteriorated and toxicology checks confirmed dying cap mushroom poisoning. She stated she was speaking to Simon within the hospital when the subject of her dehydrator got here up, and he requested: “Is that the way you poisoned my mother and father?”
She stated his remark bought her interested by how she had dried foraged mushrooms in it weeks earlier.
“I used to be beginning to assume, ‘What in the event that they’d gone within the container with the Chinese language mushrooms? Perhaps that had occurred,’ ” Patterson stated, including it made her really feel “actually anxious as a result of Youngster Safety have been concerned and Simon appeared to be of the thoughts that possibly this was intentional. I simply bought actually scared.”
Media crews assemble outdoors Latrobe Valley Magistrates’ Courtroom in Might.
Martin Hold/AFP through Getty Pictures
cover caption
toggle caption
Martin Hold/AFP through Getty Pictures
4. Patterson says she lied to authorities out of worry
Prosecutors stated that whilst docs confirmed the sufferers have been affected by “severe toxin syndrome attributable to ingestion of amanita phalloides mushrooms,” they didn’t instantly obtain the antidote as a result of there was an absence of proof to verify that they had ingested such mushrooms.
On Friday, Patterson confirmed she didn’t inform anybody about the potential for the contaminated mushrooms. Rogers requested why she did not alert medical authorities as quickly because it occurred to her, on Aug. 1.
“I had been instructed that folks have been getting therapy for attainable dying cap mushroom poisoning,” Patterson answered. “In order that was already taking place.”
As an alternative, she confirmed that the subsequent day she drove her youngsters to high school, got here house and removed the dehydrator, taking it to what’s referred to as a tip — a second-hand retailer at a waste facility.
Heather Wilkinson and Gail Patterson died on Aug. 4, and Donald Patterson died the next day. Ian Wilkison was extubated on Aug. 14 and discharged to rehab on Sept. 11.
She stated she disposed of the dehydrator “within the context of pondering that possibly mushrooms that I would foraged, or the meal I ready was accountable for making individuals sick,” and that after she discovered of the deaths, “it was this silly, knee-jerk response to only dig deeper and preserve mendacity.”
“I used to be simply scared, however I should not have completed it,” she added.
Patterson additionally stated she did a manufacturing facility reset of her cellular phone in the course of the police investigation as a result of “I knew that there have been images in there of mushrooms and the dehydrator and I simply panicked and did not need [detectives] to see them.”
That did not cease prosecutors from displaying images taken on her cellphone in April 2023, depicting wild mushrooms being weighed on a scale. They advised Patterson had completed so to calculate a deadly dose, which she denied.
