A Gurgaon-based actual property agency proprietor has reignited the wage expectation debate with a viral put up criticizing tech professionals for demanding what he calls “unjustifiable hikes.”
The controversy started when the entrepreneur, recognized as Bhandari, shared on X {that a} tech candidate requested for a 137.7% soar—from ₹8 lakh to ₹19 lakh each year—with out clearly articulating their worth proposition.
The backlash was swift, with many calling his stance outdated and reflective of poisonous recruiter tradition. However Bhandari has doubled down. “Since my final put up on a techie asking for a 137.7% hike ruffled many feathers, I’m sharing one other instance,” he wrote. This time, it was a feminine candidate asking for a 100% hike—from ₹12 lakh to ₹24 lakh—citing her youngster’s worldwide college charges as justification.
“There are quite a few such examples we come throughout ever so usually,” he added. “Candidates asking for the moon with out with the ability to articulate why they deserve it.”
He went additional, claiming the post-COVID wage growth within the IT sector has skewed expectations. “The sense of entitlement amongst these this put up triggered is astonishing,” he wrote. “Most are in for a impolite awakening.”
His core argument: wage hikes have to be primarily based on benefit, not private want. “Each enterprise is a for-profit entity. Jobs exist as a result of the enterprise turns a revenue. Until you’re employed for a loss-making PE/VC-funded startup,” he added, warning job seekers to justify the worth they carry when asking for big jumps.
The web, nonetheless, had different concepts. One person wrote, “In the event you’ve determined to rent somebody, what they at the moment earn is immaterial. You could have a funds and an evaluation course of. Make your finest provide and transfer on.”
One other referred to as out “colonial-era pondering,” arguing that “firms who worth their workers pay primarily based on expertise and the funds for the position—not on final CTC.”
The talk underscores a deeper cultural pressure in India’s hiring practices—between a legacy of cost-to-company pondering and a rising demand for skill-based compensation and transparency.
