Early within the COVID-19 pandemic, the failure of UK authorities advisers to comply with World Well being Group (WHO) recommendation and rising proof from East Asia that suppression might convey the virus beneath management rapidly led to avoidable UK deaths, argues an knowledgeable in The BMJ.
Suppression goals to keep away from nationwide lockdowns and preserve financial exercise for many of the inhabitants by introducing surveillance techniques to convey new outbreaks beneath management rapidly, thus decreasing the reproductive charge of an infection (R0) to under 1 and inflicting the epidemic to wither.
Anthony Costello, professor of world well being at College Faculty London says, had the UK adopted a suppression technique, it might need prevented hundreds of deaths. He asks why long-term methods of suppression proceed to be under-recognized and requires higher governance of UK pandemic science recommendation.
In January 2020, the worldwide menace from COVID-19 was clear and the WHO was advising nations to concentrate on fast suppression to keep away from an instantaneous menace from the unfold of the brand new coronavirus, he explains.
But whereas Greece, Germany, Norway, and Eire took steps to comply with these suggestions, the UK authorities’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) unanimously selected a response based mostly on pandemic flu that ignored the completely different traits of coronavirus transmission.
Nor did SAGE change its recommendation after experiences of quickly falling circumstances and an infection charges in a number of East Asian nations that had centered on suppression. As a substitute, in March 2020, the federal government revealed its “comprise, delay, analysis, mitigate” plan based mostly on influenza that may enable the virus to unfold to attain “herd immunity.”
SAGE’s unwavering resolution to advocate a response based mostly on influenza has continued to be defended by its co-chairs, Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, and Patrick Vallance, chief scientific adviser till 2023, notes Costello.
But their protection relies on three arguably mistaken assumptions: that COVID couldn’t have been suppressed, that a large second wave might comply with even when it was, and that suppression required extended nationwide lockdowns.
He acknowledges that SAGE confronted a tough and fast-changing state of affairs in early 2020 however says its recommendation to authorities was “flawed” and “arose from techniques failure.”
As an illustration, SAGE didn’t advocate fast growth of testing, type plans to mobilize neighborhood well being staff as contact tracers at scale to hotspot areas and throughout district well being safety groups, or advise on key monetary and help measures for efficient self-isolation, he writes.
“Had the UK adopted the identical technique and achieved the identical extra cumulative demise charge by March 2024 as South Korea, 69 as a substitute of 344 deaths per 100,000, it might need prevented as much as 180,000 UK deaths.”
The BMJ requested Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance why that they had not really useful a suppression response, given WHO recommendation and rising proof early within the pandemic; about SAGE’s lack of impartial specialists; why they weren’t extra outspoken about health-harming insurance policies; and whether or not they stand by the suggestions they made to not concentrate on suppression, however had not acquired a response by the point of publication.
Costello factors out that, 5 years on, lots of the individuals who developed the UK’s flawed response are nonetheless in submit; they haven’t modified their views on suppression, and little has been completed to enhance authorities pandemic recommendation committees or to introduce detailed governance guidelines for the UK’s future pandemic response and resilience.
“The COVID inquiry and the UK medical institution ought to correctly critique this public well being failure,” he concludes.
Extra data:
Evaluation: UK resolution to not suppress covid raises questions on medical and scientific recommendation, The BMJ (2025). DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2025-082463
Quotation:
Failure to concentrate on COVID suppression led to avoidable UK deaths, says knowledgeable (2025, Might 11)
retrieved 11 Might 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2025-05-failure-focus-covid-suppression-uk.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Aside from any honest dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is offered for data functions solely.
