A candid dialogue on Reddit has pulled again the curtain on what some say is the “aspect no person likes to confess” about first-generation Indian immigrants in the USA.
The unique submit, titled ‘First-Gen Indian Immigrants within the US – The Aspect No person Likes to Admit’, listed recurring patterns the creator claims to have noticed over years of dwelling and dealing round Indian immigrants. These included forming insular social circles, exploiting fellow immigrants in workplaces, pushing multi-level advertising schemes, carrying over corrupt practices, holding on to sexist and casteist attitudes, disregarding private boundaries, and sustaining double requirements in terms of American values versus Indian social hierarchies.
“This isn’t all first-gen Indians, however the patterns are too frequent to disregard,” the submit learn, inviting others to share their experiences.
The thread rapidly drew responses from around the globe. One consumer from the San Francisco Bay Space mentioned that they had stopped participating with the native Indian neighborhood altogether. “I really feel Mumbai is much extra liberal and useful than right here. I solely keep for my son, who has particular wants, as a result of the general public college system helps him properly,” they wrote, including that process-driven methods and shared family tasks had been among the many few positives.
A commenter from Europe mentioned their makes an attempt to bond with fellow Indians had been met with exclusion and inflexible social norms. “They communicate good to your face however hold a robust fortress to maintain others outdoors. So my spouse and I made a decision to not have interaction and spend time with simply our children,” they shared.
One other identified that such clannishness isn’t distinctive to Indians in America. Citing Tamil enclaves in Mumbai and Delhi, they famous that language limitations and cultural habits usually hold first-generation migrants from integrating, whereas second-generation Indians are inclined to mix in additional with wider society.
The dialogue has sparked a bigger dialog on whether or not such social patterns are rooted in cultural preservation, immigrant survival methods, or deeper systemic attitudes that persist throughout borders.
