Key takeaways:
- Illness-specific patient-reported final result devices could also be extra delicate to vary in patellofemoral instability vs. region-specific instruments.
- Illness-specific instruments may additionally scale back ceiling impact.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Illness-specific patient-reported final result devices are extra delicate to vary vs. region-specific devices in assessing adolescent patellofemoral instability instances, in response to information offered right here.
“Going ahead, it will make sense to make use of the [Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII 2.0)], which is extra particular as a substitute of utilizing the Kujala [score],” Shital N. Parikh, MD, professor of orthopedic surgical procedure at Cincinnati Youngsters’s Hospital Medical Middle and the College of Cincinnati School of Medication, instructed Healio about outcomes offered on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports activities Medication Annual Assembly.
Within the research, Parikh and colleagues utilized prospectively collected information from the Justifying Patellar Instability Remedy by Outcomes (JUPITER) cohort to research postoperative patient-reported final result (PRO) scores of 263 sufferers youthful than 19 years of age (median age, 15 years; 67.3% ladies) who had been recognized and handled for patellofemoral instability.
Each affected person included within the research accomplished a set of 4 PROs at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. The PROs measured included BPII 2.0, Kujala rating, IKDC rating and KOOS rating.
In line with Parikh, BPII 2.0 was extra delicate to vary following patellofemoral instability surgical procedure vs. Kujala, IKDC and KOOS. As well as, he stated BPII 2.0 was the one PRO instrument not related to a ceiling impact.
“And not using a ceiling impact, the evaluation supplies a wider journey of scores, permitting for a extra nuanced and exact differentiation amongst high-performing people or teams,” Parikh stated.
He added, “For any joint situation or illness that you’re treating, you probably have a questionnaire that’s particular to that joint situation, you need to use it fairly than utilizing a generic instrument, which is attempting to judge all the joint for all circumstances.”
For extra info:
Shital N. Parikh, MD, will be reached at shital.parikh@cchmc.org.
Sources/Disclosures
Collapse
Parikh SN, et al. Paper 27. Introduced at: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports activities Medication Annual Assembly; July 10-13, 2025; Nashville, Tenn.
Disclosures:
Parikh stories receiving grants from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports activities Medication, Orthopedic Analysis and Schooling Basis, Arthroscopy Affiliation of North America, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, ConMed, and College of Cincinnati to fund this research.
