Welcome to a different version of CEDARS/ASPENS Debates. CEDARS/ASPENS is a society of cornea, cataract and refractive surgical procedure specialists, right here to debate a few of the newest scorching matters in ophthalmology.

Whereas endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has taken off and turn out to be the usual surgical process for decompensated corneas secondary to endothelial illness, there are new therapies on the horizon which can be probably safer and simpler to carry out, much less invasive and extra accessible. If these take off, EK could also be considerably decreased and even eradicated sooner or later. Parag A. Majmudar, MD, and Jodi Luchs, MD, focus on these new choices and share early examine outcomes. Study and luxuriate in.
Kenneth A. Beckman, MD, FACS
OSN CEDARS/ASPENS Debates Editor

Cell injection remedy
Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) represents important development in comparison with full-thickness corneal transplantation.

Outcomes of each Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty are excellent, restoration is quicker, and the rejection price is considerably decrease. Nevertheless, EK remains to be a surgical process that entails a surgical studying curve, and issues comparable to dislocation of the graft and long-term failure stay a chance. The opposite implication is that there’s a 1:1 donor-to-recipient ratio for every DMEK or DSEK process, and this will not be sustainable in areas of the world the place there’s a persistent scarcity of corneal donor tissue.
Cell injection remedy is an rising know-how that would realistically turn out to be a substitute for corneal transplantation. Along with a shorter studying curve, it could additional scale back the chance for rejection, and it permits for a a lot increased ratio of recipients per donor, probably 1,000:1 because the cells are cultured and expanded in vitro. The injection is minimally invasive and should even probably be carried out in a minor process room. Though the process stays in an early experimental stage, restoration is prone to be a lot quicker.
There are at the moment two injectable cell remedy approaches within the pipeline. AURN001 is being developed by Aurion Biotech, which was lately acquired by Alcon however remains to be working as an impartial firm. Allogenic human corneal endothelial cells and a Rho kinase inhibitor are cultured and administered as a single intracameral injection. The affected person then lies facedown for 3 hours to let the cells coat the endothelial floor.
In Japan, the product was authorised and launched with the commerce identify Vyznova (neltependocel) in September 2024. Within the U.S. and Canada, the part 1/2 CLARA medical trial has proven constructive 6-month outcomes, with 50% of sufferers within the excessive cell dose group attaining an enchancment in finest corrected visible acuity of three or extra strains in contrast with 14% within the Rho kinase group. It additionally confirmed enchancment in corneal thickness and enhanced high quality of life. The remedy was nicely tolerated, with no important hostile occasions. Part 3 is anticipated to begin later this 12 months.
Emmecell is one other participant on this house. Its EO2002 cell product makes use of a proprietary magnetic cell supply system. The classy endothelial cells are magnetized, and sufferers put on an exterior eye masks that draws and holds them in place towards the floor of the endothelium after they’re injected. Subsequently, no head-down positioning is required after surgical procedure, and the entire process is carried out within the workplace with the affected person sitting up. As in contrast with the AURN001 know-how, fewer cells must be injected as a result of the magnetic system ensures higher adherence of a better proportion of cells. Solely a small part 1 examine has been carried out to date, however sufferers acquired on common 150,000 cells vs. the greater than 1 million cells of the AURN001 injection. Fewer cells probably imply much less immunogenic response.
Within the examine, sufferers had a median achieve of 11 letters, and 38% improved by 15 or extra letters. Corneal thickness was diminished, and there have been indicators that this remedy may need the power to scale back guttae. This chance can be groundbreaking and must be explored. If we might inject these cells in sufferers on the earlier levels of corneal guttata, we could possibly probably reverse the method and halt illness development. The corporate is now elevating funds to have the ability to transfer on to part 2 and three research.
Neither strategy requires descemetorhexis; nevertheless, Aurion’s protocol is to carry out endothelial “brushing” to take away non-functioning endothelial cells and to stop crowding and call inhibition. The Emmecell protocol doesn’t mandate endothelial brushing, which, if demonstrated to be clinically efficient, could additional scale back procedural complexity. Past simplifying the method and decreasing rejection charges, these therapies maintain important potential for public well being, notably in bettering entry to donor cells in creating nations.
- For extra info:
- Parag A. Majmudar, MD, of Chicago Cornea Consultants, will be at pamajmudar@chicagocornea.com.
Pharmacotherapy
Trefoil Therapeutics’ TTHX1114, an injectable engineered type of fibroblast progress issue, is a brand new possibility for the remedy of endothelial dysfunction.

It’s a pharmacological strategy that overcomes the issue of rejection and is easier than cell injection remedy. This drug has proven the power to scale back corneal edema and stimulate endothelial regeneration by reversing ferroptosis, an iron-dependent type of cell dying, distinct from apoptosis and characterised by lipid peroxidation and iron accumulation resulting in plasma membrane harm.
Corneal edema is brought on by endothelial dysfunction, which produces a lack of the endothelial barrier and a lack of the endothelial pump operate, permitting the cornea to turn out to be swollen. Endothelial dysfunction is sustained by ferroptosis, and TTHX1114 reverses this course of, restores endothelial operate and stimulates endothelial regeneration.
Within the part 2 STORM examine, sufferers with Fuchs’ dystrophy had been injected intracamerally with TTHX1114 following a Descemet stripping solely (DSO) process through which the central 4 mm of Descemet’s membrane and dystrophic endothelium had been eliminated. The drug boosts the impact of DSO by stimulating epithelial regeneration and proliferation and reduces the oxidative stress on the endothelium produced by the surgical trauma. It may additionally scale back the oxidative stress and ferroptosis of the remaining endothelium, which can then be more healthy and hopefully operate higher. Within the examine, the drug was examined at totally different doses, and sufferers acquired a variable variety of injections. On day 84, on the finish of the examine, 75% of sufferers within the higher-dose group had corneal thickness that was lower than corneal thickness at baseline. The sufferers receiving the medicine had a statistically important enchancment in finest corrected visible acuity and a quicker restoration of imaginative and prescient following the stripping process. The common time frame to return to twenty/40 or higher imaginative and prescient was 4.2 weeks, considerably shorter in contrast with sufferers who didn’t obtain the medicine.
Following DSO, usually the cornea turns into swollen, and the time for visible restoration is on common 2 to three months regardless of the administration of Rho kinase inhibitors. With the addition of TTHX1114, the time to discount of the edema and the restoration of imaginative and prescient had been considerably sped up, and this demonstrated that there was a remedy impact, which was dose dependent.
The corporate is now making ready its subsequent part 2b examine to judge the consequences of TTHX1114 in sufferers with corneal edema of any supply, together with Fuchs’ dystrophy, ocular trauma or earlier surgical procedure (together with cataract surgical procedure).
The great thing about this remedy is that it regenerates a affected person’s personal endothelium, so nothing is transplanted and there’s no danger for rejection. When injecting allogenic cultured cells, the chance is definitely decrease than it’s with graft transplantation, however the danger remains to be there to some extent. As well as, cell know-how requires culturing, and the cells must correctly adhere to the posterior cornea and proliferate there. With this strictly pharmacological strategy, we reduce down on all these levels and considerably scale back the probabilities of failure. As well as, the injections might probably be repeated over time if wanted.
The subsequent levels of medical testing contain injection with none surgical procedure, and down the road, the remedy may evolve towards a topical formulation.
- For extra info:
- Jodi Luchs, MD, of Florida Imaginative and prescient Institute, will be reached at jluchs@aol.com.