Advertisement

Microsoft shuts down Pakistan operations after 25 years, claims founding CEO; Ex-Pak President calls it a troubling signal for financial system


Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
Microsoft has formally exited Pakistan after 25 years of operations, in line with the CEO who launched the tech large’s presence within the nation in 2000. The corporate, which entered Pakistan on March 7, 2000, ended its operations and not using a formal announcement. “At present, I realized that Microsoft is formally closing its operations in Pakistan. The previous couple of remaining workers have been formally knowledgeable and identical to that, an period ends…” stated Jawwad Rehman, Microsoft’s founding nation head in Pakistan.

Political and financial chaos behind the transfer

Whereas Microsoft has not issued a public rationalization, the corporate’s exit is extensively linked to Pakistan’s unstable financial system, shifting political panorama, and weakening commerce circumstances. Frequent modifications in authorities, excessive taxes, a fluctuating foreign money, and difficulties in importing know-how have made the surroundings difficult for multinational companies.

Pakistan’s commerce deficit for FY2024 reached USD 24.4 billion. By June 2025, international alternate reserves had fallen to simply USD 11.5 billion, instantly affecting tech imports and general investor confidence.

Former President recollects misplaced alternative

Former President of Pakistan Dr. Arif Alvi additionally responded to the event, linking the exit to missed alternatives brought on by political instability.

“Microsoft’s choice to close down operations in Pakistan is a troubling signal for our financial future. I vividly recall February 2022, when Invoice Gates visited my workplace. On behalf of the individuals of Pakistan, I had the distinction of conferring the Hilal-e-Imtiaz on him for his outstanding contributions to polio eradication in our nation.


As we sat within the garden exterior my workplace, our dialog spanned fascinating subjects like AI, Quantum computing, intestine microbiomes, longevity, and extra. Throughout our dialogue, I requested him instantly, ‘Why isn’t Microsoft investing in Pakistan?’ He leaned in, sharing in confidence that he had simply spoken with PM Imran Khan and organized a name between the PM and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. In a hushed tone, he requested me to maintain it quiet, revealing that ‘all is ready and inside two months, the PM and I’ll announce a significant Microsoft funding in Pakistan.’However then, all the things went quickly downhill. Regime change upended these plans, and the promise of funding slipped away. By October 2022, Microsoft selected Vietnam for its growth, a call through which that they had initially favored Pakistan. The chance was misplaced.Pakistan now spirals in a whirlpool of uncertainty. There may be growing joblessness, our expertise is migrating overseas, buying energy has decreased, financial restoration within the ‘awami’ context appears like a distant & elusive dream.

A legacy that remodeled Pakistan’s tech scene

Past enterprise, Microsoft performed a number one function in Pakistan’s digital journey. It launched laptop labs in rural faculties, supported digital adoption amongst small companies, and labored with academic establishments. “We tried to present Pakistani youth an actual shot at alternative,” stated Jawwad Rehman.

India-Pakistan commerce tensions worsen the surroundings

Commerce relations with India have additionally deteriorated. Bilateral commerce dropped from USD 3 billion in 2018 to USD 1.2 billion in 2024. Important imports similar to medicines are actually routed via third international locations, growing delays and prices. This rising geopolitical stress has additional weakened Pakistan’s funding local weather.

(Disclaimer: This text is predicated on LinkedIn and social media submit on X. ET.com has not independently verified the claims made within the submit and doesn’t vouch for his or her accuracy. The views expressed are these of the person and don’t essentially replicate the views of ET.com. Reader discretion is suggested.)