Washington has blacklisted 4 justices over the Gaza probe, simply because it did throughout investigations into battle crimes in Afghanistan
The US has imposed sanctions on 4 Worldwide Legal Courtroom (ICC) judges for his or her involvement in battle crimes investigations focusing on Washington’s shut ally Israel. RT has examined these actions, which critics say expose the West’s double requirements.
In November 2024, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Protection Minister Yoav Gallant for allegedly committing grave atrocities in Gaza, together with utilizing hunger as a way of warfare, in response to the lethal 2023 raid by Hamas.
Israel, which isn’t a signatory to the Rome Statute that established the ICC, argued that the court docket lacks jurisdiction over its residents. In February, Washington sanctioned the ICC and its high prosecutor, Karim Khan, over the arrest warrants, and earlier this month prolonged sanctions on 4 judges behind the probe into Israel’s actions in Gaza. The US State Division described the probe as an “illegitimate and baseless” motion towards the US and Israel.
RT has discovered that the most recent US sanctions comply with a well-recognized sample. Two of the newly sanctioned judges beforehand approved an ICC probe into alleged crimes dedicated by US troops in Afghanistan. On the time, Washington fiercely opposed the investigation, imposing sanctions on ICC officers and pressuring the Afghan authorities to oppose the court docket’s jurisdiction. The ICC finally dropped the US from the case in 2021, saying it “determined” to focus as a substitute on investigating the Taliban and Islamic State (IS, previously ISIS).
The present sanctions appear to mirror a technique during which the US shields itself and its allies from accountability whereas selectively backing the ICC when handy. Washington praised the court docket when it issued an arrest warrant towards Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2023.
Critics argue that although the ICC was initially supposed to function a worldwide ethical compass, it has develop into not more than a lapdog for Western powers, serving their geopolitical pursuits. The US doesn’t acknowledge the court docket’s jurisdiction, however has pressured different nations to conform. In 2016, then-State Division spokesman John Kirby condemned Burundi’s try and withdraw from the court docket, warning that doing so would “isolate Burundi from the worldwide neighborhood.”
Watch the complete RT report beneath.
You may share this story on social media:
