Key takeaways:
- Of abortion-providing clinicians in states that applied a ban, 42% relocated vs. 9% in states with no ban.
- A examine creator instructed Healio that extra analysis is required to see how these developments have an effect on sufferers.
In a current survey of abortion-providing clinicians, 42% who practiced in a state that banned abortion after the Dobbs determination relocated their follow, most frequently to a state with no ban.
“This happened inside a 12 months of the Dobbs determination,” Dana Howard, PhD, an assistant professor within the division of bioethics at The Ohio State College Faculty of Drugs, instructed Healio. “Extra analysis is required to discover what’s driving these developments, however we’re beginning to see how authorized restrictions on abortion are impacting the reproductive well being workforce.”

Abortion-providing clinicians who practiced in a state that banned abortion had been considerably extra more likely to relocate than these in a no-ban state. Picture: Adobe Inventory
The findings construct on earlier analysis displaying abortion bans have an effect on suppliers’ selection of follow location.
The present survey was disseminated from Might to December 2023 to skilled listservs for abortion-providing clinicians in america and through snowball sampling. The researchers focused clinicians who supplied abortion care the 12 months earlier than the Dobbs determination and/or on the time of the survey. They categorized abortion ban states as those who applied a near-total ban or a 6-week gestational ban after Dobbs.
Their remaining evaluation included 305 abortion-providing clinicians throughout 44 states and Washington D.C. Amongst them, 26% practiced in a state that applied a ban after Dobbs.
Total, 16% (n = 47) of respondents stated they relocated their main follow state. Those that practiced in a state that banned abortion had been considerably extra more likely to relocate than these in a no-ban state (42% vs. 9%), in line with the researchers.
Amongst clinicians who relocated from a ban state, 89% moved to a no-ban state.
“In a earlier evaluation of the identical survey, our workforce discovered that the majority of our respondents (93%) are proving well being care past abortion care,” Howard stated. “When these clinicians are compelled to depart states that ban abortion, sufferers are left behind with much less entry to reproductive and maternal well being care.”
The researchers discovered that 17 respondents stopped offering abortion care after Dobbs, 13 of whom had been in ban states.
“The authorized panorama relating to abortion is continually altering, and it might take years to find out the broad affect that restrictive state legal guidelines are having on reproductive well being care workforce,” Howard stated. “This examine of clinicians offering abortion provides us early perception into the bigger future shifts. Extra analysis is required in actual time to find out how these legal guidelines are affecting clinicians and what hospitals, medical associations and policymakers can do to raised assist clinicians offering patient-centered well being care, in addition to the sufferers left behind after they depart.”
References:
For extra data:
Dana Howard, PhD, will be reached at dana.howard@osumc.edu.