PoliticusUSA can solely keep impartial via the help of our readers. You possibly can help us by turning into a subscriber.
Trump at all times manages to flee accountability as a result of he finds others to do his soiled work. Within the case of Trump accepting a $400 million aircraft from Qatar, the autumn man seems to be Secretary of Protection Pete Hegseth.
Home Judiciary Committee Rating Member Jamie Raskin wrote to Hegseth to inform him that by accepting the aircraft, he’s breaking the legislation.
Raskin wrote partly:
Having carried out such an impressive job coercing a international authorities into making an unconstitutional and illegal reward, you had been rewarded by the President on your work when he assigned you to be the official to formally settle for the “flying palace” from the Qatari royals.
Your personal spokesperson on the Division of Protection (DOD) acknowledged: “The secretary of protection has accepted a Boeing 747 from Qatar.”
Alas for you, which means, as of at present, you at the moment are the one in violation of the International Emoluments Clause of the Structure, as a result of it’s plainly simply as unconstitutional for you—one other “individual holding [an] Workplace of Revenue or Belief” 8 of the US—to simply accept this luxurious aircraft from the monarchical authorities of Qatar as it’s for President Trump to take action. You might be additionally in violation of the International Presents and Decorations Act.
That legislation supplies congressional consent for presidency officers to simply accept sure presents of as much as $480 in worth— although not $400 million jumbo jets—from international governments. The Act expressly prohibits an worker of the US—which incorporates you—from “request[ing] or in any other case encourag[ing] the tender of a present” as President Trump had evidently carried out along with your assist and that of Ambassador Witkoff.
Even worse for you, the Act supplies that, to deal with violations, “the Legal professional Common could carry a civil motion … towards any worker who knowingly solicits or accepts a present from a international authorities” not in accordance with the Act—which this “reward” isn’t—and permits a courtroom to evaluate a penalty “to not exceed the retail worth of the reward improperly solicited or acquired plus $5,000.”
