This subsequent piece reposts a hyperlink to our latest op-ed at Actual Clear Politics.
There may be way more data and the whole article, Crime Charges of Unlawful Migrants Underreported,” by John R. Lott, Jr. at Actual Clear Politics, Might 22, 2025.
With the intention to persuade People we should disarm, Democrats have included prison and gang-related shootings of their incorrect definition of “mass shootings.”
We all know they do it and we have now new analysis from John Lott exhibiting that if we do a greater job preventing crime, we’ll rid our nation of most mass shootings.
A brand new dishonest survey titled “Publicity to Mass Shootings in the USA: A Nationwide Survey” was revealed in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE). It claims that roughly 6.95% of U.S. adults reported having been current on the scene of a mass capturing (18.37 million), and about 2.18% sustained accidents throughout such incidents (5.76 million). . . .
M Dowling, “The Lie They Inform to Disarm the USA,” Unbiased Sentinel, Might 27, 2025.
A examine by Dr John Lott on the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart of what the FBI calls “defensive gun makes use of” factors out “The FBI tracks energetic capturing circumstances—the place people try to kill individuals in public locations, excluding these tied to robberies or gang violence. This examine is the primary to systematically evaluate how uniformed police and civilians with hid handgun permits carry out in stopping these assaults. Civilians with permits stopped the assaults extra steadily and confronted a decrease danger of being killed or injured than police.”
Bear in mind tales like this the subsequent time liberal gun grabbers let you know we’d all be safer if solely we disarmed extra law-abiding individuals.
By the numbers, 94 p.c of shootings occur in “gun-free zones”, essentially the most harmful locations round. . . .
Lars Larson, “Good Man with a Gun Saves Lives in Seattle,” Lars Larson Present, Might 29, 2025.
Extra broadly, research summarized by John Lott, president of the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart reveal that violent crime tends to lower because the variety of carry permits will increase, significantly in states with constitutional-carry legal guidelines. . . .
Dr. John Lott, Jr., the president of the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart (CPRC), not too long ago described the outcomes of a ballot that the CPRC commissioned final December on crime and gun management. The ballot requested basic election voters in America which of three approaches, of their opinion, was probably to cut back crime: enacting extra gun management; stricter enforcement of present gun management legal guidelines; or having legislation enforcement arrest violent, repeat offenders and ending cashless bail reforms.
Lower than one in 5 respondents felt the reply was extra gun management. “Regardless of all of the claims about assist for gun management, solely 19% of voters suppose passing extra gun management will scale back crime, barely extra (21%) suppose stricter enforcement of present gun management” is the answer. In distinction, greater than half of respondents (54%) believed that the best method was to crack down on prison perpetrators by preserving violent offenders off the streets via arrest and detention.
As Dr. Lott factors out, in contrast to different polls and surveys this ballot supplied a response selection aside from gun management and so is extra more likely to precisely replicate the general public’s emotions. He cites a Rasmussen survey achieved with an analogous set of voters at about the identical time because the CPRC ballot, however which framed the query in a extra constricted method (“Which might do extra to cut back gun violence in America, passing new gun management legal guidelines or stricter enforcement of present gun management legal guidelines?”). There, additionally, “new gun management legal guidelines” was a much less in style selection than higher enforcement of present legal guidelines (31% vs. 56%), however with none third selection, “each percentages are a lot increased than when respondents have the choice of arresting criminals and preserving them in jail.” (Unsurprisingly, the “new gun management legal guidelines” choice in that survey was hottest amongst Democrats, supported by 49%; in distinction, solely 18% of Republicans felt it was the higher method.) . . . .
Employees, “Clueless Anti-gun Democrats Dig Themselves an Ever Deeper Gap,” NRA, Might 19, 2025.
Educational John Lott states that in each case the place weapons (or simply handguns) are severely restricted or banned, the murder fee goes up. . . .
Dr. John Lott, Jr., the president of the Crime Prevention Analysis Heart, not too long ago described the outcomes of a ballot that the CPRC commissioned final December on crime and gun management. The ballot requested basic election voters in America which of three approaches, of their opinion, was probably to cut back crime: enacting extra gun management, stricter enforcement of present gun management legal guidelines, or having legislation enforcement arrest violent, repeat offenders and ending cashless bail reforms. . . .
Employees, “They’ve Discovered Nothing: Dems Nonetheless Pushing the Similar Failed, Unpopular Gun Management That Bought Them The place They Are At the moment,” Taking pictures Information Weekly, Might 21, 2025.
