After shedding final month in Orange County Superior Court docket, the state of California is asking a state appellate courtroom to overturn a Huntington Seashore measure that would require voters to current picture identification to solid ballots in native elections.
Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber, the state’s prime elections official, have been tangling with Huntington Seashore in courtroom for greater than a 12 months over Measure A, which amends the town constitution to say that native officers “might” require picture ID for municipal elections beginning in 2026.
In April, Orange County Superior Court docket Choose Nico Dourbetas stated the state had not proven that “a voter identification requirement compromises the integrity of a municipal election.” Huntington Seashore Mayor Pat Burns known as the ruling a “big victory.”
Bonta appealed Wednesday to the 4th Appellate District, the place the state hopes for a extra favorable listening to. In February, a three-judge panel from the 4th District stated that Huntington Seashore’s assertion of a “constitutional proper to manage its personal municipal elections free from state interference” was “problematic,” however kicked the case again down to Orange County Superior Court docket.
Greater than 53% of Huntington Seashore voters supported the constitution modification within the March 2024 election.
The modification additionally requires that Huntington Seashore present 20 in-person polling locations and to watch poll drop containers. Town has not shared plans on how the legislation could possibly be applied in subsequent 12 months’s elections.
A consultant for Huntington Seashore didn’t reply to requests for remark Thursday. Town’s legal professionals have argued that the town constitution offers native officers autonomy to supervise municipal points, together with native elections.
Bonta and Weber contend that whereas California’s 121 “constitution cities” can govern their very own municipal affairs, native legal guidelines can’t battle with state legal guidelines on problems with “statewide concern,” together with the integrity of California elections and the constitutional proper to vote.
The voter ID legislation is one in all a number of fronts within the ongoing battle that conservative officers in Huntington Seashore have waged in opposition to California for the reason that begin of the COVID-19 pandemic. Town has used comparable arguments about its constitution metropolis standing in fights over state housing legal guidelines, schooling insurance policies for transgender college students and “sanctuary state” immigration legal guidelines.
The problem of voter ID has change into a flashpoint with conservative politicians, together with President Trump, who in January demanded that California enact a voter ID legislation with a purpose to obtain assist for the devastating Los Angeles space wildfires.
California voters are required to confirm their identities once they register to vote, and the state imposes legal penalties for fraudulent registration. California doesn’t require picture identification on the polls however does require that voters present their names and addresses.
The picture ID measure can also be invalidated by Senate Invoice 1174, which Gov. Gavin Newsom signed final fall, which bars native election officers from requiring picture identification in elections.
