Could 12 (IPS) – On April 23, India suspended the Indus Water Treaty (IWT), a 65-year-old settlement that had been a uncommon image of cooperation between India and Pakistan regardless of a long time of hostility. The suspension got here a day after militants attacked civilians in Jammu and Kashmir, a disputed area, killing 26 individuals, most of them Indian vacationers. India accused Pakistan of supporting “cross-border terrorism” and responded by halting the treaty. Pakistan denied involvement within the assault and referred to as India’s transfer an “act of warfare.”
The IWT, signed in 1960, was a landmark settlement that allowed the 2 international locations to share the water of the Indus River system. It gave India management over the jap tributaries (Ravi, Sutlej, and Beas), and Pakistan management over the western tributaries (Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab). Past water-sharing, the treaty established mechanisms for information sharing, technical cooperation and dispute decision. For many years, the treaty was celebrated as a triumph of diplomacy and environmental cooperation. However its suspension now threatens to unravel this legacy, with devastating penalties – particularly for Pakistan.
Why the IWT Issues
Pakistan’s economic system relies upon closely on agriculture, which employs practically 70% of its rural workforce. The Indus River irrigates 80% of the nation’s farmland, making it a lifeline for hundreds of thousands. If India had been to divert or scale back water flows, it might cripple Pakistan’s agriculture, triggering widespread meals insecurity and financial instability. The stakes are excessive, and the results of failing to handle shared water sources responsibly would ripple far past Pakistan’s borders.
The timing of the IWT’s suspension couldn’t be worse. Local weather and environmental dangers are escalating throughout the Asia–Pacific area, with excessive climate occasions turning into extra frequent and extreme. Between 2008-2023, floods displaced 57 million individuals in India alone. In Pakistan, floods haven’t solely destroyed properties however have additionally degraded soil high quality, leaving farmers unable to develop sufficient crops to outlive. These pressures are driving migration to cities, the place migrants face exploitative situations and sometimes accrue giant money owed.
Local weather Dangers and Regional Instability
The hyperlink between local weather change and regional instability is turning into unattainable to disregard. In Central Asia, a 2021 conflict over transboundary water sources between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan left 50 lifeless and displaced 10,000 others. Within the Pacific, rising sea ranges are forcing complete communities to relocate, sparking tensions in international locations like Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. In the meantime, large-scale infrastructure tasks, akin to hydroelectric dams in Southeast Asia, are displacing 1000’s and straining relations between international locations like Laos, Thailand and Vietnam.
The demand for vital minerals to construct renewable vitality sources is including one other layer of complexity. Competitors between China and the U.S over these sources is heightening world tensions. Vital mineral mining can also be fuelling exploitation and violence in mining areas, just like the Philippines and Indonesia. These examples spotlight a troubling actuality: local weather and environmental dangers will not be simply environmental points – they’re additionally safety points.
The Case for Regional Cooperation
Responding to those challenges requires a collective strategy. Local weather dangers don’t respect nationwide borders, and trying to deal with them in isolation is a shedding technique. Cooperation gives a approach to pool sources, share information, and construct resilience. For low-income international locations specifically, regional solidarity—by way of local weather finance, information sharing and technological switch—might imply the distinction between survival or collapse.
However cooperation isn’t nearly survival; it’s additionally about seizing alternatives. Joint local weather motion can strengthen regional ties, foster peace and create shared prosperity. Cross-border collaboration on local weather and environmental points can join establishments, analysis communities, and civil society, laying the groundwork to deal with future challenges. By working collectively, the Asia–Pacific area can flip shared challenges into shared strengths.
The suspension of the IWT is a wake-up name. At a time when cooperation is extra vital than ever, we can not afford to let geopolitical tensions derail local weather motion. The Asia–Pacific area faces immense challenges, however it additionally holds immense potential. By prioritising collaboration over confrontation, the local weather disaster might present a chance for peace, resilience, and shared prosperity. The trail ahead gained’t be straightforward, however it’s the one path price taking.
Associated articles:
Sinéad Barry is an Analyst at adelphi’s Local weather Diplomacy and Safety programme.
Emma Whitaker is a Senior Advisor at adelphi’s Local weather Diplomacy and Safety programme.
This text was issued by the Toda Peace Institute and is being republished from the authentic with their permission.
IPS UN Bureau
© Inter Press Service (2025) — All Rights Reserved. Unique supply: Inter Press Service
