CAMBRIDGE, MA., Apr 30 (IPS) – On March 17, Mexican President Claudia Scheinbaum signed into regulation a constitutional reform banning the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) corn. The motion adopted a December ruling by a commerce tribunal, underneath the U.S.-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) commerce settlement, in favor of a U.S. grievance that Mexico’s 2023 presidential decree, with broader restrictions on the consumption of GM corn, constituted an unfair commerce apply by prohibiting using GM corn in tortillas.
The Mexican authorities publicly disagreed with the ruling, claiming that the three arbitrators had failed to think about the scientific proof Mexico introduced within the yearlong case. However the authorities selected to conform, rescinding the three particular components of the decree deemed to restrict future GM corn imports. Nonetheless, the federal government left intact the decree’s measures phasing out using the herbicide glyphosate, establishing a protocol for monitoring GM corn imports into the nation, and banning the cultivation of GM corn within the nation.
The constitutional modification enshrines that final measure in a extra everlasting method. Whereas GM corn has confronted planting restrictions for greater than a decade, the constitutional ban represents an necessary act of resistance and sovereignty, significantly in gentle of the flawed determination by the tribunal.
Commerce panel fails to think about proof
Corn is central to Mexico’s agriculture, delicacies, diet, and tradition. Mexico is the middle of origin for corn, the place the crop was domesticated 1000’s of years in the past. It stays on the core of the nation’s farming, weight loss program, and tradition. As President Sheinbaum acknowledged in approving the constitutional ban on GM corn cultivation, “Sin maiz no hay pais” – with out corn there is no such thing as a nation.
In protection of Mexico’s 2023 decree, the panel acknowledged that the federal government introduced scientific proof from certified and respected sources of “dangers to human well being arising from the direct consumption of GM corn grain in Mexico, and dangers to native corn of transgenic contamination arising from the unintentional, unauthorized, and uncontrolled unfold of GM corn in Mexico.” (That proof is summarized in an intensive publication from Mexico’s nationwide science company.)
The commerce tribunal dismissed issues about such dangers in its ruling, primarily giving itself a move on reviewing the scientific proof of human-health dangers by arguing that Mexico had not carried out an accepted danger evaluation “based mostly on related scientific ideas,” a reference to prevailing worldwide codes for such processes.
The panel additionally failed to guage the dangers to native corn. Mexico introduced sturdy proof that GM corn has cross-pollinated native corn varieties, gene movement that threatens to undermine the genetic integrity of the nation’s 64 “landraces” and greater than 22,000 varieties tailored by farmers over millennia to totally different soils, altitudes, climates, meals, and customs.
The tribunal argued that no particular safety from GM corn was wanted as a result of gene movement already takes place from non-GM hybrid sorts of corn, and GM contamination is not any totally different from non-GM gene movement. “Mexico has not demonstrated how the menace to the traditions and livelihoods of indigenous and farming communities from GM corn is larger than the menace posed by non-native, non-GM corn,” the panel wrote. Cross-pollination from hybrid corn “might equally threaten the genetic integrity of native corn.”
Equating contamination from GM corn with that of hybrid corn is a critical misreading of the science and of Mexico’s tradition. GMOs by definition – and by express definitions within the constitutional modification – contain crossing species boundaries, introducing, for instance, a gene from a bacterium right into a corn plant to repel bugs. In distinction, hybrid corn is produced by cross-breeding totally different corn varieties, the ensuing offspring remaining pure corn, with no non-corn genes in its DNA.
Mexican farmers have an extended historical past of creating a few of their very own cross-pollinated varieties, deliberately combining a local selection with a hybrid that has properties the farmer wishes. Such cross-pollination has nothing in frequent with undesirable contamination from GM corn, imposed on farmers with out their knowledgeable consent. They name it “genetic air pollution.”
It will possibly pose a long-term danger to native varieties. Transgenic traits don’t all the time reveal themselves after contamination. Which means farmers can unknowingly unfold such contamination from their pollen yr after yr to different corn crops. Mexican researchers found such contamination of their 2013 survey of native corn varieties. Biotechnologist Antonio Serratos reported that a number of the native varieties he discovered even inside Mexico Metropolis had transgenic traits of their DNA.
“In Mexican fields, transgenic native maize is being created,” he advised me on the time. ”If maize seeds are offered or exchanged, the contamination will develop exponentially. That’s the level of no return.”
Seed-sharing underneath menace
The tribunal’s various advice for controlling undesirable gene movement recommended that “the casual seed alternate practices of indigenous and farming communities” was one of many “underlying points” Mexico ought to tackle to stop contamination as an alternative of proscribing imports.
Limiting seed-sharing is fully at odds with the science of seed variety and evolution, says researcher Erica Hagman, who helped put together Mexico’s protection within the USMCA dispute. Mexico’s wealthy corn variety is the direct results of millennia of adaptive practices by farmers of their fields. The tribunal’s suggestion that Mexico ought to restrict such seed-sharing to stop GM corn contamination runs counter to the practices of in situ conservation of agricultural biodiversity.
Mexico’s constitutional ban on GM corn cultivation ensures that such misguided reasoning won’t information public coverage. The modification was strengthened by proposals from civil society that prolonged the ban to new genetically engineered seeds by banning any crops “produced with strategies that overcome the pure boundaries of replica or recombination, equivalent to transgenics.” This limits a number of the new generations of genetically engineered crops.
Whereas the constitutional reform doesn’t embrace a number of the unique language proscribing GM corn consumption, little question in deference to the commerce ruling, the ultimate model reveals a transparent desire for non-GM crops, leaving the door open to tighter regulation.
Tania Monserrat Téllez from the Sin Maíz No Hay País coalition known as the reform “a significant step ahead for the protection of native corn varieties, the well being of the Mexican inhabitants, and the safety of Mexico’s biocultural heritage related to corn.”
Timothy A. Smart is the creator of Consuming Tomorrow: Agribusiness, Household Farmers, and the Battle for the Way forward for Meals (New Press 2019) and a researcher at Tufts College’s International Growth and Atmosphere Institute.
IPS UN Bureau
Comply with @IPSNewsUNBureau
Comply with IPS Information UN Bureau on Instagram
© Inter Press Service (2025) — All Rights Reserved. Authentic supply: Inter Press Service
